a drama, as it writes the Life: Max was born out of wedlock, first the father is several years behind Swedish curtains, then the mother dies, Max is looked after by their grandmother. When any after the death of the mother sought custody of the father and gets it too - even if limited. The grandmother then brought an appeal - and gets told that she has no right to. And that also means the Supreme Court.
The decision of 02.02.2011, Az XII ZB 241/09 it moves to the position that grandparents in child custody matters is not a fundamental right of appeal. Even under the old law had the legislature in § 57 para 1 No 8 FGG relatives and of the appeal in family cases other than conscious to keep the circle of the complaint entitled manageable and to avoid jeopardizing the formal finality of custody decisions (not BT-pressure . 13/11035 p. 26 f.).
grandparents were therefore only right to complain if they gem. § 20 FGG (now § 59 I FamFG ) are affected in their own right.
The position as relatives or substantiate such own right, not even the fact that the grandparents had taken particular responsibility here; darasu would still not have its own legal position. In particular, grandparents have no "parental rights" in Article 6 II GG , especially not one that a parent could be opposed. It is otherwise only if the grandparents already in place as guardian of the parents in this legal position eingerückt seien.
Der vom Gesetzgeber ausdrücklich gewollte und bereits 1998 realisierte Ausschluss des allgemeinen Beschwerderechts Verwandter sei zu respektieren.
Im konkreten Einzelfall ergaben sich übrigens keine großartigen Auswirkungen: Das Gericht hatte das Aufenthaltsbestimmungsrecht nicht auf den Vater übertragen, sonder auf das Jugendamt und dieses hatte natürlich bestimmt, dass Max bei der Oma bleiben sollte...
Fokus-Familienrecht Schnell-Info zum Urteil ( zum Vergrößern anklicken):
Diesen Post als pdf herunterladen .
0 comments:
Post a Comment