Friday, March 4, 2011

Rotodent Vs. Sonicare

Annual fee VV 2300 - Supreme Court tilts the cap limit of 1.3!

"A fee of more than 1.3 can be requested only if the activity was umfachreich or difficult." states explicitly in the text of the VV RVG 2300th And yet the Supreme Court is now beyond this limit. It has the colleague Dr. Hans-Jochem Mayer in Beck-Blog out explicitly.

Why Does My Kidde Alarm Chirp

jus-news: Family Legal



Issue 11/09: supervisory duty of parents to school - death of the breadwinner - semester abroad and maintenance - private health insurance and maintenance - including



  • OLG Zweibrücken: A mother who cared for a 5-year-old child, has "only" 3/4-tags . Work This ruling explains and comments from Mr Klaus Wille Cologne unterhalt24.com .
  • an overview of the supervisory duty of parents to school the colleague is also from Alsdorf
  • Who pays more after the death of debtor the maintenance? An overview is Mr Tobias zinc from Stuttgart
  • have children to claim that the debtor pays them the more private health insurance . This issue and a ruling of the OLG Koblenz to discuss the colleague Brandau .
  • also semester recognized under the child support be paid by the agents know if they serve to promote training (China-residence of a Sinology student) ready Hans Otto Burschel in explaining a ruling of the OLG Karlsruhe in the Beck-Blog
  • Another Case the Constitutional Court regarding the right of non-marital father's involvement in the child custody comments on the law Lupe

A beautiful weekend wishes
Focus Family Law
RA & FAFam Gerhard Kassing - Munich

Basketball Shorts During 80's

from other blogs is the diligent the fool? - Supreme Court on maintenance obligations of people with additional jobs

keyword list dutiful Secondary activity. "I work more than I need, and therefore more in your pocket. Do I have this" more "now pay child support? One each for the individual question to answer, says the Supreme Court.

He had to judge the case of a retired pharmacist who even after exceeding the retirement age further work and was taken out of additional income in addition to the pension because of maintenance to complete. In its decision of 12.01.2011, Az XII ZR 83/08 = NJW 2011, 670 with (as usual excellent) Note the Dortmund colleague Winfried Born (who also wrote the provocative question in the title, see FamRZ 1997, 129), the Supreme Court first determined that anyone who has reached the standard age for retirement, whether or not legally halt work on. If he does it anyway, he is "on duty as directed." Whether he
additional income from pay then something must depend on the circumstances of the case. In other words: You have to look at each case in detail.
If the maintenance debtor actually bite even with the pension enough and works such as further only by inclination, while the claimant has to scrimp bad, it can truly come to the conclusion that the additional income is to be included in the calculation of maintenance with .
Does the debtor but continues because his Ruhegeld (unverschuldet) zu knapp und er auf die Nebentätigkeit angewiesen ist kann es genauso sein, dass der Zuverdienst außer Ansatz bleibt. Born fasst das Für und Wider der Berücksichtigung des Zuverdienstes wie folgt zusammen:

Für die Berücksichtigung sprechen u.a.:
  • schlechte wirtschaftliche Verhältnisse
  • Schmälerung des Unterhalts durch unzureichende Altersvorsorge des Pflichtigen
  • ursprüngliche Planung der Eheleute
Gegen die Berücksichtigung sprechen u.a.:
  • Übertragung hoher Versorgungsanwartschaften oder Vermögenswerte auf den Berechtigten im Rahmen der Scheidung
  • fortgeschrittenes Alter des Pflichtigen
  • zunehmende körperliche und geistige Belastung durch die Zusatz-Arbeit
Es bleibt also dabei: Alles eine Frage von Treu und Glauben. Und eine Frage guter Sachverhaltsdarstellung. Wer detailliert und intelligent zu seinen finanziellen, beruflichen und Lebens-Verhältnissen vorträgt, fährt bei der Beurteilung zum Schluss besser, denn es gilt auch hier wie in vielen Fällen: "Mach's Maul auf - oder den Geldbeutel".  Unsere Anwaltskunst beim Sachvortrag ist also einmal mehr gefragt.

Fokus-Familienrecht Schnell-Info zum Urteil ( zum Vergrößern anklicken):



Diesen Post als pdf download .

PS: Today Hans-Otto Burschel reported in Beck-Blog by a decision of the OLG Karlsruhe v. 02.24.2011 - 2 UF 45/09 = BeckRS 2011, 04 661, in which the Court the added merit of an established, considered retired doctor to 50%